CINQUE is not an AI SOC. It is the trusted source that feeds one.
An AI SOC is only as good as what it is reasoning over. Point one at a queue of uncorrelated alerts and it will summarize the queue. Point one at correlated personas, baselines, and journeys and it starts informed.
Automation applied to uncorrelated signal produces faster uncorrelated signal.
Most security operations tooling reasons over events. An event says what happened. It does not say whether the identity behind it was supposed to be there, what it normally does, or what else it touched on the way. Without that, every triage decision is a lookup across consoles that the analyst has to perform by hand.
Alerts arrive without a subject
A finding attached to an IP or a hostname is a lookup task before it is a decision.
Normal is undefined
Anything can be called anomalous when nothing has a documented baseline.
The journey lives in six places
Reconstructing what an identity did before and after the alert is most of the work and none of the value.
Automation inherits the problem
A playbook that fires on weak context makes a weakly reasoned decision at machine speed.
What CINQUE hands the SOC.
Into the workflow your team already runs.
Direction is deliberate and settled: CINQUE does not push. The other system pulls. That constraint holds for every integration described on this page.
What CINQUE does not do.
Stated plainly, so nobody is surprised in month two.
- CINQUE is not a SIEM, a SOAR, or an AI SOC, and it replaces none of them. It is the correlated source they reason over.
- CINQUE performs no enforcement and runs no remediation workflow. It produces the recommendation and the evidence; your systems act.
- We make no claim about alert volume, false positive rates, or analyst time saved. Those numbers belong to your environment and we will not invent them.
Same platform, different question.
All use cases · What is Unified Security Posture Observability?